Handbrake x264 vs x265. Jan 29, 2024 · And HandBrake 1.

Handbrake x264 vs x265 May 4, 2022 · The x265 encoder versions are slightly different, but I believe that is not the reason for the difference. Reply reply NovelExplorer 4 days ago · I think when you use the good encoders in HandBrake (x264/x265) it's not running FFmpeg but the x264/x265 encoders directly. In a nutshell, this is what the x264 developers did and the x265 people have taken it even further, to create these monstrosity of code bases, with numerous "optimizations", that just over-analyzes the video and jumps through hoops to redistribute the bit rate. Feb 15, 2023 · Conclusion about H. x264 may be fatter but it works well. This is due to either too many files or the size of the files. Audio i set it to ac3 5. Even with an i9 10980XE, encoding a 2 hour 4K video takes a day at a time on CPU at the slow preset. But it's worth comparing (actually watching the movie) x264 with x265 and NVENC to see how the results are for your personal preferences and sensitivities. While counter intuitive at first, this is due to the more complex algorithms used to more precisely estimate motion and preserve details. And I'll be honest I've decided to stick with x265 over AV1 as well. So the additional options would be for the encoder, not FFmpeg. Apr 28, 2021 · Amazon links:Mac Mini M1 https://geni. 264(x264). These aren't good x264 settings. If you move it down to 720p, you can move the CRF up to 17-18. Try it yourself, you don't even need Av1an (although I still recommend it due to scene based encoding and resuming) as SVT scales very well around many threads. IMPORTANT POINT: the quality slider on x264 and x265 are not on the same scale! You'll see the default quality on H. 265 determined by whatever the hardware is able to support. Most people would have a hard time telling the difference between 1 frame thread encoding vs 4 frame thread encoding when watching the video, but the impact to fps while encoding adds up. Note: it has been found that 10-bit x265 can have better quality than 8-bit x265 even if the source is 8-bit and the playback device is 8-bit without dithering, but the benefit is marginal and it's not about banding improvement but inherent efficiency gains from the precision boost. So between 2 different encoders it's worse. Nice and fast, files are somewhat compact (better than with my GTX1070) and compatible. Now the file size difference is the 265 is a little bigger by like 50mb and I've looked them side by side and the bitrate for the 265 is only higher in certain spotsnow my question is should I download the 264 or 265 version. Handbrake has "x265 3. 265's maximum picture quality is no better than H. avi and the output file is the1. Easily Convert Video from x264 to x265 or Vice Versa . I want to apply the option selective-sao=2. It depends on what you're happy with I'd say. 84 GB (2 330 kb/s, x264 8 bit) vs 3. 5+37-07b011400" but I've tried with ffmpeg with older x265 and the result was identical to the latest x265. I think there is some sort of noise reduction going on with x265 which makes it throw away a hair of detail like . At CRF 16, I can see distortion in the grain in some scenes which I don't like! x265 is a complete waste of time because of how slow it is, and it is only saving something like 15-25% of the bandwidth that x264 would at similar bitrate. Would I be better off going average bitrate? If so, what rate would you target? Mar 8, 2011 · Im thinking of changing my bluray encodes from x264 in handbrake to x265 to squeeze out a little more space. x265 will surely cut down your storage letting you add more contents, but using with Plex, it may cause a problem if your client has to transcode the x265 to x264. More often than not for codecs, it's an open source software implementation of the encoder whose name it refers to (x265 for H. The beauty of x264 and x265 is they come with recommended presets, which contain a whole set of settings. Nov 19, 2020 · I'm doing some x264 -> x265 software encoding right now on my newly-arrived 8GB RAM Mac mini M1, and the performance under the Handbrake 1. What I was trying to get at is that x264 and x265 are pretty close and even the same quality when dealing with higher bitrate encodes while taking far less time to do the actual encode. I then changed the video encoder to "H. Handbrake guidelines recommend an RF factor between 22 and 28 for UHD content (for x264/x265). 265/x265 or NVEnc if you want x265 you can start with CRF20, slow preset is a good start to test, but for blu-ray movies I prefer x264, it's better in my opinion, much sharper and detailed (even with the sao option off). Make sure if you choose x265, that you enable main 10 as the encoder profile in the video tab. To make sure your video doesn’t exceed a specific level, you simply have to make sure the other parameters fit within the constraints imposed by the level. Software x264 can produce better results than software Mainconcept, but you usually have to get into the extremes to really notice anything. yuv, again with quantization parameters between 24 and 42. The speed is OK for HD or lower content with x264 8-bit, but for 4K and/or x265 and/or higher bit depths it is indeed quite slow. With x264, I would generally go with 'CRF 14/15' and 'Very Slow' preset and 'film tune'. Yes less storage occupancy will be less and that's good but what good is that if I see a blurry blob on the screen. 33MB clip. I'd avoid it for another year or two at least until it matures OP. Over the next year or two the GPUs will go from The x265 sub appears dead (no posts in 2 years) so I thought I'd ask here. 264 encoder, x264, sets the appropriate level automatically based on all the other settings. I'm using Xeon 2191B with x265 SLOWER preset and 1080ti with x265 SLOWEST preset. Apr 27, 2023 · Video Codec: Click Video tab > change the video codec from H. 265, not on the features of x264 vs x265. For example: Is there a difference in the file output between QSV and non QSV encoded QuickSync and other hw based encoders are still h. For some hardware encoders, they can output better H. S. 4, For middle of the road X265, For best compression AV1-AOM This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (handbrake. After a week tweaking x265 settings, I gave x264 a go and was surprised to find I got essentially the same image quality much quicker and with a smaller size compared to x265. Or you could try to maintain the same quality, but at a lower bitrate. x265 10-bit veryslow vs slower vs slow I made the mistake of encoding my whole library with x264 10-bit, so now I need to re-encode all of it. On a i3 7100 + 16GB ddr4 based system, the x264 encodes finished in under a minute, the x265 encodes finished 20 minutes for the park one and 13 minutes for the field one, that woks out to less than 1 fps encode speed, a To conserve space, first and foremost, make sure you're using x265. X265 default is 28, and they recommend +/- 2 given personal taste. It is consistent with what google tell us about VMAF:"Real Networks wrote a white paper in the subject and they found that VMAF 93 is a good value to target, but everything with an average over 90 will look good. For the couple of 4K rips I have done, x265 10-bit CRF26 has been fine. " Is x264 still recommended for encoding films for offline playback? What are your thoughts? EDIT: Topic can be closed. 265 does have advantages over H. I understand now. The file sizes and encoding times of the encoded videos were: using H. 264 Kimono1_1920x1080_24. In x265, the slower the preset, the bigger the file size is at the same crf. 265 anyway. So if you need to hit a specific target and need it to look as good as possible, x264 from Handbrake or ffmpeg is a great way to go. 265 10-bit. Once upon a time, x264 was the de facto standard for 1080p. P. x264 Medium 'probably' does a little bit better if you have the time to encode. avi -c:v libx265 -x265-params crf=23. I'd have separate encode settings for DVD, Bluray, and 4K, of course, but beyond that I could still batch encode each and get a good crunch. 264 and H. Top x265 vs x264 + Reply to Thread. x264/x265). I got x264 for anything 1080p or lower, and x265 for anything higher than 1080p. So whether it's a film camera or digital camera is not relevant to this and the name "film" should not be interpreted as having anything to do with actual film but to the process of capturing live action with Video codecs. 264 encoders. per the spec) or as implemented in popular software encoders (e. Opening a video source How to get your Handbrake CRF + x265 was generating files bigger than the original files with some settings, or would turn the image into a muddy blur with other settings… But somehow average bitrate worked great on it (took nearly 10 hours to encode, but came out well in the end). 6Mbps H. 265 10 Bit With Alternative Equivalent Audio Codec (DTS --> AAC) Best Settings (aka Help Please) there is a difference. STV will look clearer in bright spots and movement but suffer slightly in darker spots and background compared to X265. Members Online Trying to understand the encoder options more- ripping DVD collection H. x264 Medium imo is still king, Slow is not better. 264: MPEG-4 Part 10, also known as H. x264 is fast enough on an 8-core CPU that it hardly pays off to go with a faster encode for offline movies. With that in mind, let’s take a quick peek at how pre-alpha x265 stacks up against the well-optimized x264. You can do the same for 4k but x265 vs AV1 (ignore x264) This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (handbrake. Are there some tweaks to x265 that I'm missing, or does it simply lose its size advantage in HD at low CRF values? Source video size: 23. SVT-AV1 on preset 8 is nearly as fast as x265 medium and preset 7 is faster than x265 slow while being more efficient. Absolutely hate film grain lol. those settings are implanted as default because x265 encoding has such a bad reputation for SLOW encode times, even on high end hardware. I've been experimenting with all iterations of x264 and x265 since they first became available, and x264 still wins hands down over x265 at 1080p in terms of retained quality for the same average bitrate if you know how to use x264 properly. Jan 19, 2021 · All my compressions are done with Handbrake a 20gb Bray can take 2-3 hours with x264 but only 20 mins with the GTX. So I use the default 28 on iPhone recordings i've taken, and I bump it up to 30. It will do the job much quicker but less efficiently (in terms of visual quality per bitrate) -- meaning the resulting file will require a higher bitrate/filesize vs. 5x smaller file sizes for equal quality compared to H264. an x264/x265 CPU encode of equivalent visual quality. x265 over nvenc all day, the better efficiency is well worth the wait imo. 1 640kbs. Jul 19, 2023 · Certainly, the codec of the video also go through with changes from x264 to x265. x265 slow gets a couple improvements to make x265 more worthwhile, although a lot of people disable rect since it causes a big performance hit for not much efficiency gain. Sep 27, 2024 · x265 is a specific software encoder for H. Handbrake certainly doesn't recommend against it, it's the primary mode you will be encoding in. 7 was released. 0 -c:a copy the1. X265 CPU - Whats the current state of play? Hi all, whats the current general opinion/state of play when it comes to H265 encoding, especially for 4K video. However, when I compared the same RF between Fast and Slow preset, the quality was quite different. Members Online NVENC vs x265 vs x264 at slow and medium settings @8 mbps Oct 3, 2016 · Comparing x264 with x265, they actually cross-over at CRF28, with a slight lead to x264 for values less than 28 and a slightly bigger lead to x265 for values greater than 28. 264 vs h. I was suggesting you reencode from x264 10bit to x265 10bit using your CPU to get a high quality file and then allow your rig to transcode as needed for clients that don't support it. I’ve since read on a forum that the quality level is not consistent between encoders. us/AppleMacBookProM1 All Question: I did some close up comparisons of the videos, and the quality of the x265 file is pretty comparable to what NVENC produced. For example, my rip of Reservoir Dogs is 1. If you were to use Handbrake to re-encode something at a fixed bitrate, then technically although it would take longer for x265 to process compared to x264, it should result in better quality. Skip to content. I have a Ryzen 5900x and I still get roughly 2fps on the x265 10-bit veryslow preset and 3. I've used Handbrake for many years but recently came across some quality issues in the first few seconds of a video (Rick and Morty Episode) even with the latest Handbrake 1. After what was almost a marriage ending amount of testing and comparisons, I went with constant quality 18 on fast encoder preset. 4K = 22 Encoder tune = Film Encoder Profile = High Preset = Very Slow Simple question is what crf is the equivalent if i want the same quality for each using x265 10bit HD4600 iGPU (4670K locked at 3. Meaning low bitrates and complex images. H265 NVENC vs. The x265 project is based on the x264 code so they're very similar to one another, though obviously they implement different encoding. 264. fr), this sub is I chose x265 size it provides MUCH better quality at lower bitrates compared to x264 saving a considerable amount of HDD space with very minimal loss of quality. Using RF 20 with H. Fun fact now that you've mentioned it: x264 is actually an open-source version of H. I'm not sure what they're basing that on. Post your testing results with HandBrake. 265 10bit with intel quick sync video without losing much video quality. fr), this sub is for information exchange and helping out, not affiliated with the developers. 265 (x265)", and all other settings remained the same. I tried the following two custom presets to encode a sample 60FPS HDR, 4K Video. Note that this is only true if you're starting from an h. 264 at any bitrate, due to implementation choices and timelines. Ohhhh. The 1080ti encoding still much quicker than CPU. In x265 the big jump in quality is when you switch from medium to slow, so you can go further but it's a lot of time of encode. 265 players that are 2160p capable (aka "Ultra HD" capable). 264 for 4K encodes, and has broader playback support for 10-bit (which is more common with 4K than lower resolutions). No, H. spaced by 4). the source they used was from the DVD It supports both 10-bit x264, and 10-bit x265. 265 for comparison at 11 different CRF values, evenly spaced from 8 to 48 inclusive (i. It's less about what they can do and more about how important your source material is. It's true that for x264 and x265 using frame-based multithreading there are diminishing returns above 6 cores, but it doesn't mean that you get no benefit from the extra cores/threads at all - and the CPUs with those high core counts can intelligently Oct 6, 2017 · 265 encoding with Handbrake vs 264. This makes it extremely difficult to choose compression settings to maximise quality vs file size. See full list on handbrake. Often times I get two torrent options, X264 or X265, X265 being much lower in size, but is it the same? as the X265 is more efficient in compression. Here, I’m taking a look at various RF settings in Handbrake, both in terms of visuals and filesize. 3mb/s bitrate) vs x264 (30. 8 (it's technically still 30, haha) for all Hollywood made movies. 265, the increase in detail for scenes in motion cannot be overstated. The slowness if x265/SVT-AV1 isn't worth it there, they don't have much advantage. 265, x264 for H. 265 is a significantly more complicated process, so it is expected to be slower than HandBrake’s H. The quality of a x264 veryfast CRF 18 is maybe equals to a x264 veryslow CRF20. 264 High 10 @ L5 (45 Minutes long, 4. 1. I then took the same 8 GB video and did RF 0 in fast vs slow preset. Members Online Is there a quality difference between the different presets for x265 encoding? When using medium with x265, there's so little advantage to x265 you may as well stick with x264 (on something slower that's the same speed as x265 medium), unless you're at 4K+ or targeting very low bitrates (like RF 30). 264 files. Some of the presets for x264 offer higher quality settings because x264 is super efficient and faster to encode, even in slow encoding modes on older hardware. I follow TRaSH's guide and rules: x265 is good for for 4k stuff or 1080p if they used the the remuxes as source. So definitely use that if you aren't already. Some notes, x265+veryslow+psnr is nearly unusable for any actual encoding, it's just too slow. It’s critical that when using it, you specify the encoder-profile. What codec is it you're using with QS just curious? HandBrake’s H. x265 is the name of the standard H. Handbrake may do something differently than Program Y does in it's toolchain, x264/x265 may behave differently from VP8/VP9/AV1 or even other versions of x264/x265, and Source Y may be impacted differently from The Force Awakens. 8. So, HLG and HDR10 content must always be encoded with x265 (not x264) if you want compatibility with "Ultra HD" TVs and set-top boxes. If you have the same DVD and are looking to reproduce this test, the following settings were used: x264 Preset: very slow; x264 Tune: none; x264 Profile: high; x264 Level: 4. Try animation preset but that tends to kill a lot of detail (or energy). 6Ghz due tiny enclosure, else its heats up) using handbrake (older batch seems faster on these chips), normal preset but QSV and RF20 The encoding preset should simply enable or disable what the encoder can do for speed vs encoding time. You can also use NVENC 10-bit through like Staxrip and it goes a little faster. I want to convert a bunch of 4K h264 videos to h265. I was looking for a tool that would allow me to see the codec used for all files in a folder so i can easily filter out the files already in X265 and select only those i still need to do. As i've read on a few forums that basic recommendations that im using for x264 are as fallowed: DVD = 18 720 = 19 1080p=20. 44gb with 28. RF 22 very slow vs RF 20 fast >> 30. 9fps on slower. For high quality HD encodes, I'm on x264. 264 is a closed-source standard with a number of international companies involved, and actually requires a licence to use. NVENC is nvidia’s encoder which can only encode h264. Members Online Sharing my recommended "standard" settings for x264 and x265 encodes for best quality/size output Finding that x265 has better quality for size when it takes 15 minutes and x264 takes 3 minutes isn't particularly enlightening, since x264 has better quality for size when it takes 15 minutes than when it takes 3 minutes. But there is no film tuning for x265. This is a trade off for both x264/5 with the former having it worse. For a typical TV show, in the old days people would use something like --tune film for x264 . Unless you have specialised requirements, deviating from the presets without in-depth knowledge about the way x264 and x265 works isn't recommended. If your source file is in a different codec (say, h. From what I've read, I felt like VMAF is now the superior metric hence why I didn't bother to run for PSNR. which one should look better? thx If you still do 2 pass Handbrake encoding I'd suggest you look at using just ffmpeg. The latest beta release of Handbrake has AV1 as well as 265 nvenc 10-bit Using a 40gig 1 hour 40 min 2060p HD source file to test with, using all the options afforded. efficiency. x264 vs x265, which is better? In this article, we'll discuss the difference between x264 and x265 to help you understand them better. It seems this implies that x265 degrades the image less even at the same CRF value where lower-bitrates may be involved. The following video codecs are available for encoding in HandBrake. But h264 and h265 aren't as rare as I thought. I play everything either through my TV or Roku Ultra and never have any issues with Direct Streaming unless I have . 4. The choice between them should be based on h. Whenever i open a file in handbrake i don't see what original codec it is, only what codec i want it to use. If you interested in file sizes, x264 was 9. Nowadays x265 can do just as good for 1080p or less content. 264 it's 20. When you get to 4K, or if you're going for really low bitrates (for kids tablets or whatever), then the newer codecs have a clear advantage to make the slowness worthwhile. Thread starter orionquest; Start date Oct 6, 2017; Jump to latest Follow Reply Status x264 vs x265: 55. 0MB vs 30. I am using AMD RX570 for AMD VCE encode. 5+1-f0c1022b6" and ffmpeg has "x265 3. 264 source file. 8MB RF 18 very slow vs RF 16 fast>> 67. The open source video transcoder. It will preserve HDR and the wide color format in 4K blu-rays, but it will also decrease the size and decrease color banding on videos that aren’t 4K blu-rays, and it’s supported on basically every device that supports H. "film" goes the opposite way. In Handbrake I like CRF 18 I use Tone mapping to get rid of HDR for devices that don't support HDR I set the present to normal or slow (reduces file size) I also get rid of Atmos tracks or HD MA (regular 5. It doesn't even mention the encoder used. HandBrake’s H. There's no reason to use x265 anylonger since SVT 0. This is my sabnzbd history folder, x264 and x265 are by far the most common. I'm new to using handbrake and AV1, so I can't comment on settings too much. I always tune the settings to the source. I'm pretty new to handbrake and I'm using the A380 QS to use AV1 with ICQ around 14 or 13. H265 10-bit for 1080p(/i) Blu Rays If so, that's disappointing as I was able to get decent settings for x264 and x265 for a variety of media. 4 beta 1 appears to be on par with my 2018 32GB RAM Mac mini 6-core i7 in terms of frames per second (they're churning away on the same file right now), which is somewhat less than I expected based on Most of HandBrake’s official Presets use the x264, x265, or SVT-AV1 video encoders with a Constant Rate Factor, sometimes abbreviated CRF or simply RF. 265 (x265): Also known as HEVC This is the next generation of encoder that offers even higher quality encodes and better filesizes over H. And they are both inferior in my view to the Hanbrake. Aug 27, 2016 · The x264 encoding was performed by x264 core 142 r 2479 dd79a61, and the x265 encode was performed by x265 1. us/AppleMacBookAirM1 MacBook Pro M1 https://geni. 264s in general (i. The size of AMD VCE encodes are much higher than X264 but it's so much faster than X264 if you prefer a little bid of compression (2GB to 800MB) at 720P it's a good choice but if you want to Compress as much as it's possible you can try X264 or X265 (2GB to 400-500MB) at 720P so if i want to compress a video and keep it on my External Hard drive without losing Quality i'll choose AMD VCE and Jan 29, 2024 · And HandBrake 1. The intention behind film is that it for live action ie actual actors, people, stuff shot with a camera. Handbrake won't get you there, so I suggest learning how to use ffmpeg via a bash/batch script and adding X264 VS X265, Software encoding VS Hardware, 8-bit encoding VS 10-bit encoding, single-pass encoding VS two-pass encoding, then we have which software is better, to debate. 33x more bitrate. X265 and AV1 don't compare to X264 in visual quality. x265 comparisons and i don't like the subtle blending that x265 is doing. Jul 31, 2016 · Worth noting that HandBrake's GitHub page is now showing even newer versions of both x264 and x265 - if you're successful in finding comparable x264 and x265 CRF settings on the page here, it's probably worth doing a quick test encode on your end just to verify that it's still holding true in newer versions / HB nightlies before hunkering down I also tried downloading some films from various x265 10bit ripping groups, which are considered high quality releasers. Same goes for SDR content with a resolution higher than 1080p. I'd recommend sticking with x264 as it is most common and supported. Felt like I found a happy place with x264 that maximized what I wanted to do with it but am having a tougher time finding my "middle ground" in x265. Your point is undermined by the fact you're using x265 settings that are unfavorable to the metrics (time, VMAF) and constraints (size) you're using for comparison; all you've demonstrated so far is that if you configure x265 poorly for your goals, you can get undesirable results. The problem is the GTX files are huge compared the software and I have tried them on H265 also which reduces them but X264 is still smaller. How is x265's file size so much smaller and has so much lower bit rate than NVENC? EDIT: I understood the trade-offs between size/quality regarding x265 vs NVENC, and knew NVENC was going to produce a bigger file. 1 is my limit If I'm encoding) Those are my handbrake settings. It also talks about Intel QSV as if it's a good option. 265 Video Codecs: When it comes to choosing an internet-optimized codec, the two best options are HEVC or H. 265 (x265) RF:21 >> Result file size 150MB H. But I did try to work something out for you: In terms of speed at default settings: NVENC > x264 > x265 In terms of size (if smaller size is better) at default settings: x265 > x264 =~ NVENC This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (handbrake. 265 format, but they utilize a fixed set of features of h. 265 (x265) to H. 8MB Maybe there is a tiny quality difference I don't see, so the better quality must be with the slower encode, regardless of RF value, right? X265 vs x264 compression time requirement Totally noob question of course, but I want to make I'm not being a total nitwit using wrong settings etc Normally I use x264 codecs for compression. That is intentional! I'd recommend leaving it close to the Handbrake default presets, they're there for a reason. 79 GB (4 998 kb/s, x265 10 bit). I don't download remux, so the few hevc isn't a great datapoint. then run through handbrake at H. Aug 3, 2016 · I intend to encode them using handbrake with x264 or x265 but I can't seem to decide on some factors. If you're using sonarr or radarr, you can give a higher weighting to x265 and they'll upgrade your library in the background (harnessing the power of other people who've done that work for you). Reply reply Patriotaus Yes. With H. 265 (AMD VCE) RF:21 >> Result file size 430MB HEVC (x265) is better in all regards except as people have said it requires modern hardware. 265 vs. One major point of x265 is that HLG and HDR10 are reliably supported by most H. i would download the x264 because its size is larger, but i'm confused because of the 10bit/8bit stuff. I run all my encoding through my RTX3060. x265 does have similar functionality but I have less experience with it. You have to first choose the preset and then find an RF that suits that preset. However, when using Handbrake to convert videos into x265, many don't know how to set Handbrake to get the best result. AV1 is superior in quality and compression, but it can be a problem for some users due to the limitation of compatible hardware. e. 0 the1. About HandBrake What HandBrake is, does, and does not; Getting HandBrake. Framerate: Set Same as source, after which you are allowed to choose Variable Framerate instead of Constant Framerate. Also, once you go x265, typically that file is done. Having higher frame thread count does. I found H265 (NVENC) to be 'almost' as good but x264 Medium did better in preserving fine details. HandBrake. us/AppleMacMiniM1 MacBook Air M1 https://geni. I generally stick with x264 Medium CRF20 for Blu-ray rips. The test clips were encoded with Handbrake in H. x265 10 bits is the best actually (2022)! Vastly superior to x264 and x265 8 bits, way more compatible than in the past (Youtube, Facebook, everybody accept those nowadays, most new players too) and the extra color space gives you so much power on night and low light level scenes (where you need thousands variations of dark colors). Page 3 of 3 First 1 2 3. I was thinking of using staxrip instead as its what i use for my 4k blurays, but im still a little confused with it. Jul 21, 2016 · Results: Encoding 8-bit video at 8/10/12-bit in Handbrake (x264/x265) By Matt Gadient | January 25, 2018 A web-based tool I created to let you compare the results of a video encoded at various bits in Handbrake! I just went by the x265 documentation/Handbrake recommendations. AV1-AOM is superior in every way but much, much slower. It also ONLY supports those x264/x265 variants, so if you’re using the standard 8-bit CLI, you’ll still want to keep it around. 265 encoder. Film and none are basically similar enough in behaviour to be mostly preferential. Indeed, "software" here means using a non-specialized equipment so, a CPU. If you want my opinion on the matter, x264 works best with 1080p and lower while x265 works best with 4K content. avi -c:a copy -x264-params crf=23. 265 AMD-VCE: 679MB (took 2 min 48 sec to encode) using H. Show Printable Version; Email this Page; What I will say is not precise at all, but I would say that HEVC/x265 with NVENC on a 30 series GPU (3070/3080 etc) has the same quality/file size ratio as software x264 on the very slow speed setting Encode in H. 1 IMHO, I have run some x264 vs. Jan 1, 2023 · For example: x265 vs x265(nvenc) or x265 10bit vs x265 10bit (nvenc) Maybe we shouldn't compare encoding time for now. NVenc is a hardware encoder (uses dedicated encoding hardware on GPU), and is designed mostly for screen recording/streaming, and so speed is its main objective. Members Online Encoding 4K Rips with H. 264 vs AV1 vs H. The x265 file would be very efficient in terms of file size for any given quality I usually use x264 but decided to start playing around with x265 (1080p file source). pgs subtitles. 9. Members Online I just upgrade CPUs, and handbrake only uses 40% of my cpu now. 264). 4MB vs 67. However, my x264 rips are still noticeably better even on 15" laptop WITH less file size. So many people tend to use a modified lower tune grain setting for x265. mp3 did. I have an original files which are 13. mp4 x264: ffmpeg -i D:\1. So there is no way of comparing as X264 and X265 are cpu encoding NVENC and AMD-VCE gpu encoding. Members Online H. Where x265 really shines is with low bitrates. I’ve been experimenting exporting using software x264 x265 encodes constant fr at quality 18-22 and the same with hardware (videotoolbox) encodes for 264 & 265. CRF is the standard variable bit rate (VBR) mode of encoders like x264, x265, and most modern codecs of those generations or newer. 264/AVC; Provides excellent quality, performance, and file size Feb 2, 2008 · Not with x265. First I encode a chapter with cpu encoding to get a baseline around a couple of quality values, then encode the same thing with videotoolbox trying to match for both quality and filesize. An analysis of your x264 settings The CRF is just a level that you can adjust with the SAME profiles and same settings, means if you have x264 preset slow and x264 preset slower with the same CRF you will not have the same result. 7 which contains a newer version of x265. x264 vs x265 at high bitrates, 1080p bluray, my results. 265, or even moreso a lossless codec like cineform or prores) then using x265 will give a visually superior output than x264 will for the same bitrate. Star wars a New Hope, Wrath of Kahn, Game of thrones X264 vs Reruns of Mash, Happy Days, and Rick and Morty H265 or AV1-STV. 3MB vs 45. 7GB) I want to make them smaller (less than 2GB/file) but I'm not sure which video codec should I use x264 10 bit or h. 2. Click me -x264 (10900 kb/s) vs x265 (3931 kb/s)-Keep in mind that the x265 was actually transcoded from the x264 (the x264 is the source) so it's not really a fair comparison but even so I'm happy with the result. If the media isn't source quality/remux, then there will be a loss of quality every time. Trying to shrink some high bitrate 1080p x264/x265 files into mobile friendly 480p while getting size small as possible. Generally, I've seen that x264 encodes for 1080p tend to be better than their x265 counterparts, but it's not representative for all 1080p copies out there. But really HEVC has been out for years and is the transition technology on the road to the new AVC-1 / AV-1 codec. x264 Recommended Quality RF Values The Quality slider ranges from (Low Quality) 51 to 0 (High Quality) For good quality output at reasonable file sizes, the following values are recommended: Recommended settings for x264 are: The design of x264 and x265 do not assume RF means the same thing when presets or other config are different. 265, or AV1 if you have a system that supports it. The Pi 2 say works fine with x264 but if you want all round x265 playback you basically want a desktop class Skylake CPU. At one preset, RF may result in one level of quality/filesize, and at another, it may be different. Because of smaller size, it is suitable for use cases like 4K media and above. mp4----The input file is titled 1. Apologies if this belongs elsewhere. I started with encodes from the “24” DVD (Season 6, Episode 1). NVENC is optimized for speed. Jump to page: Results 61 to 72 of 72 x265 vs x264. for highest quality x264 High 4. Understood that now x265 is getting popular but many technologies are yet to implement the support for it. After doing a few experiments playing around with quality, encoder tune, etc. I’m strictly speaking of sdr btw. which one is better? x265 vs x264 Question i want to download a movie that has 2 options: x265 10bit (29. 265 than they will H. Now, Handbrake is widely considered as the best free HEVC/H. 84gb with 27. I found that NVENC H265 will do a pretty decent job but is far less efficient (needs much more bitrate to look as good). Where to get HandBrake The officially supported version; Downloading and installing HandBrake How to get HandBrake onto your computer; Checking for updates Staying up to date with the latest features and bug fixes; Making videos. 4MB RF 20 very slow vs RF 18 fast >> 45. There are various encoder implementations via hardware (NVENC, AMF, QuickSync) as well as directly using the x264 library via your CPU aka software encoding. I have been experimenting to find the best possible way through handbrake. g. so it takes shortcuts and requires a higher bitrate to store the same quality image as x265. I notice in the log that both "sao" and "selective-sao" are listed as active tools. x264 was made by reverse-engineering H. Its heavy to encode and heavy to decode. Might be useful for some sources but I've never found it useful. x264, x264 10-bit and x265. For high quality HD encodes, x264 is the best tradeoff IMO; x265 excels at 4K and above, or low bitrate targets. fr Nov 22, 2021 · Pros: Much higher compression capability than H264, upwards of 2. H. But yeah I think film grain just kneecaps a lot of the improvements x265 made over x264, so if it’s extremely grainy you might as well encode with x264 because the file size is only going to be a little bigger but the encode time is going to be a fraction compared to x265. 265 (x265): 197MB (took 20 min 1 sec to encode) Yes I was assuming x264. mp4 For me at Oct 10, 2019 · First, one must understand x265 is fundamentally different than x264. In other words, take these results with a grain of salt! If you'd compressed those 50gig x264 blu-rays to 10gig x264 files - re-rip them from those 50gig blu-rays to 5 gig x265. This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (handbrake. For 90 minutes, I would expect file sizes to be more like ~200MB at 480p with x265, but it's more like 1GB. You CAN easily tune x265 to work well with low-res content, but it requires some experience with advanced options. You'd have to reencode, but not to both x265 and x264. 1mb/s bitrate). I wanted to try the x265 for a change and used similar settings as I would with x264 As for x264 vs x265, these are software projects that are fairly widely used in programs like FFmpeg or HandBrake. Feel free to try best-ever x264 x265 encoder - MacX Video Converter Pro Was x264 8bit or 10bit? 4 vs 3 gb - It's not a great comparison if one version uses 1. 0 added support for AMD and NVIDIA (NVENC) with an output of x265. Maybe a handbrake quirk for niche scenarios…. QSV is somewhere in the middle if i pick the quality setting. The primary problem is running out of hard disk space on the NAS. 5GB handbrake x265 10 bit settings: Ok Imma try my best I'm looking at aset of a dvd show remastered and there are two options to pick from x264 and x265 10bit. H265 10-bit for 1080p(/i) Blu Rays x264 is an open source software library that acts as a video encoder, to produce H. Also X264 if set right will give near same file size as X265 with far better This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (handbrake. 264 by VideoLAN, the same team that makes VLC. For this one, we're using the following command: x264 --preset placebo --sar 1920:1080 --fps 24 --frames 500 --psnr -o x264Kimonoq24. In handbrake with x264 i use crf 18, very slow, film tune, high profile, level 4. 83GB and the x265 is 3. So let's put encoding time aside and talk about the quality and efficiency (quality/file size) . 265 is 30, while on H. 265 video, it has nothing to do with NVENC. For these encoders, a lower RF number produces higher quality video, and a higher RF number produces lower quality video. 53GB so that roughly a 64% reduction in filesize. . Yup, I’m using handbrake. Using x265 10-bit, sao is active by default in all presets. Also, my general rule is that for every increase/decrease of resolution tiers (SD/HD/FHD/4K), you need to increase/decrease crf by 2 to compensate. Dec 2, 2022 · A picture is worth a thousand words, so here’s a side-by-side comparison of a frame from this video at 4K, transcoded at 1080p using the open-source Handbrake, at the same bitrate, using x264 and x265 respectively. 1MB clip vs. 265 480/30 preset. Here is how to encode HEVC videos with the best HandBrake x265 settings. I'm sure it is ok if you know what you're doing but the few encodes I did with it weren't amazing quality visually, and it especially didn't seem to work well with HDR af all, so I didn't stick with it. Members Online Proper_Maximum5739 In regards to the original question, I think sane values for a casual comparison's sake using ffmpeg, x265 and x264 would be: x265: ffmpeg -i D:\1. 264 Note, encoding to H. Thread Tools. vigh azbvr guejffg mfo rcl lov tprs ybziv hjnalu xtrmh